Literature DB >> 10049488

Who dares, learns: chemical inspection behaviour and acquired predator recognition in a characin fish.

.   

Abstract

Individuals that dare approach predators (predator inspection behaviour) may benefit by acquiring information regarding the potential threat of predation. Although information acquisition based on visual cues has been demonstrated for fish, it is unknown whether fish will inspect predators on the basis of chemical cues or whether such inspection behaviour results in information acquisition. Here, we first ascertained whether predator inspection behaviour can be mediated by chemical cues from predators by exposing groups of predator-naive glowlight tetras (Hemigrammus erythrozonus) to the chemical cues of a potential fish predator (convict cichlid Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) that had been fed either tetras (which possess an alarm pheromone) or swordtails (Xiphophorus helleri, which lack Ostariophysan alarm pheromones). Tetras showed a significant increase in antipredator behaviour when exposed to the tetra-diet cue, but not when exposed to the swordtail-diet cue. Chemically mediated predator inspection behaviour was also affected. Both the latency to inspect and the minimum approach distance to the predator significantly increased, and the mean number of inspectors per predator inspection visit significantly decreased when tetras were exposed to the tetra-diet versus the swordtail-diet chemical cues. We then examined a potential benefit associated with chemically mediated predator inspection behaviour. Only tetras that were initially exposed to the tetra-diet cue and that had inspected the predator acquired the visual recognition of a convict cichlid as a predation threat. Our results thus demonstrate that (1) predator inspection behaviour in the glowlight tetra can be initiated by chemical cues, (2) chemically mediated inspection behaviour is affected by the presence of alarm pheromone, and (3) inspectors benefit by acquiring the recognition of novel predators. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10049488     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  9 in total

1.  Fine-scale behavioural adjustments of prey on a continuum of risk.

Authors:  Maud I A Kent; James E Herbert-Read; Gordon McDonald; A Jamie Wood; Ashley J W Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Attack cone avoidance during predator inspection visits by wild finescale dace (Phoxinus neogaeus): the effects of predator diet.

Authors:  G E Brown; J L Golub; D L Plata
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Predator faunas past and present: quantifying the influence of waterborne cues in divergent ecotypes of the isopod Asellus aquaticus.

Authors:  Sanna Harris; Kristina Karlsson Green; Lars B Pettersson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An exotic species is the favorite prey of a native enemy.

Authors:  Yiming Li; Zunwei Ke; Supen Wang; Geoffrey R Smith; Xuan Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Brain size affects the behavioural response to predators in female guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Wouter van der Bijl; Malin Thyselius; Alexander Kotrschal; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Predator-induced changes of male and female mating preferences: innate and learned components.

Authors:  Martin Plath; Kai Liu; Diane Umutoni; Guilherme Gomes-Silva; Jie-Fei Wei; Eric Cyubahiro; Bo-Jian Chen; Carolin Sommer-Trembo
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  The hunter and the hunted-A 3D analysis of predator-prey interactions between three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and larvae of different prey fishes.

Authors:  Jorrit Lucas; Albert Ros; Sarah Gugele; Julian Dunst; Juergen Geist; Alexander Brinker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cohabitation With Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Affects Brain Neuromodulators But Not Welfare Indicators in Lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus).

Authors:  Fredrik R Staven; Manuel Gesto; Martin H Iversen; Per Andersen; Deepti M Patel; Jarle T Nordeide; Torstein Kristensen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Altruistic defence behaviours in aphids.

Authors:  Gi-Mick Wu; Guy Boivin; Jacques Brodeur; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Yannick Outreman
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.