Literature DB >> 10048964

Microsatellite instability and aneuploidy rate in young colorectal-cancer patients do not differ significantly from those in older patients.

J Yao1, K W Eu, F Seow-Choen, V Vijayan, P Y Cheah.   

Abstract

DNA and chromosomal instabilities are thought to promote colorectal carcinogenesis. Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency affects DNA-sequence integrity, resulting in microsatellite instability (MI). Tumor aneuploidy (AN) has been shown to reflect underlying chromosomal instability (CI). This study aimed at assessing the MI and AN rate of Singapore's colorectal-cancer (CRC) patients, who are predominantly Chinese, in association with age group, tumor site, Dukes' staging and gender. In contrast to a Caucasian series, the MI rate for our younger patients aged 40 or less without family history (23%) is not significantly different from that for older, sporadic patients (13%) aged 60 or more, suggesting that population screening for germline MMR mutations is unlikely to be cost-effective. Our MI-positive patients also show no significant differences from the MI-negative patients with respect to tumor site, staging, ploidy status and gender. This implies that the local MI-positive individuals may have a different profile from that of the Caucasians, indicating the possibility of underlying genetic differences. AN is also not significantly more prevalent in younger patients. In addition, a significant 21% of our patients (p < 0.00005) show no evidence of either the MI or CI pathways, implying that there is at least a third pathway driving colorectal carcinogenesis, involving neither genes that maintain DNA sequence stability nor genes that cause gross chromosomal segregation defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10048964     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990301)80:5<667::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  6 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic and molecular features of sporadic microsatellite- and chromosomal-stable colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Guoxiang Cai; Ye Xu; Hongfen Lu; Yingqiang Shi; Peng Lian; Junjie Peng; Xiang Du; Xiaoyan Zhou; Zuqing Guan; Daren Shi; Sanjun Cai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  [Chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype: roles in small intestinal carcinogenesis].

Authors:  H Bläker; A Warth; M Kloor; P Schirmacher
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Spectral karyotyping suggests additional subsets of colorectal cancers characterized by pattern of chromosome rearrangement.

Authors:  W M Abdel-Rahman; K Katsura; W Rens; P A Gorman; D Sheer; D Bicknell; W F Bodmer; M J Arends; A H Wyllie; P A Edwards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Chromosome 19q13 disruption alters expressions of CYP2A7, MIA and MIA-RAB4B lncRNA and contributes to FAP-like phenotype in APC mutation-negative familial colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Lai Fun Thean; Yu Hui Wong; Michelle Lo; Carol Loi; Min Hoe Chew; Choong Leong Tang; Peh Yean Cheah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Molecular Landscape of Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Karan Pandya; Michael J Overman; Pat Gulhati
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Chromosomal instability in near-diploid colorectal cancer: a link between numbers and structure.

Authors:  Martine Muleris; Alexandra Chalastanis; Nicolas Meyer; Marick Lae; Bernard Dutrillaux; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Richard Hamelin; Jean-Francois Fléjou; Alex Duval
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.