Literature DB >> 10048519

Proximal interphalangeal joint silicone arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis.

J J Hage1, E P Yoe, J P Zevering, P J de Groot.   

Abstract

The long-term results of 16 silicone implant arthroplasties following severe destruction of the proximal interphalangeal joint and surrounding soft tissue in 14 patients were evaluated. Two implants were revised (1 arthrodesis and 1 amputation) and are not included in the results. On a visual analog scale of 0 to 100, the subjective evaluation relating to the quality of function and the ability to perform activities of daily living scored 73 on average (range, 0-100; median, 75). The range of active motion compared with the opposite side ranged from 0% to 100% (average, 47%; median, 56%). The lateral deviation, either radial or ulnar, averaged 4 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 9 degrees; median, 4 degrees). Rotational deformity, either radial or ulnar, averaged 8 (range, 0 degrees to 32 degrees; median, 4 degrees). Pinch strength of the operated finger on average was 75% of the opposite nonoperated finger (range, 14% to 164%; median, 70%). Possible statistical correlation between objective and subjective results was evaluated. Subjectively, most patients were satisfied because they were pain free. Objectively, notable rotational deformity, alignment deviation, and loss of pinch strength and range of motion were observed, but these did not correlate well with the subjective assessment. Silicone implant arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthrosis should be used for those cases in which associated adhesions may be corrected by simple tenolysis, allowing for active range of motion shortly following arthroplasty. Even in these cases, the objective results of silicone arthroplasty may not be as good as its subjective outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10048519     DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.jhsu24a0073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  7 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Biomaterials.

Authors:  Andy F Zhu; Paymon Rahgozar; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.907

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Different Implants and Approaches for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michiro Yamamoto; Sunitha Malay; Yuki Fujihara; Lin Zhong; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Is a Vascularized Interphalangeal Unicondylar Transfer Worth the Efforts? Surgical Technique and Clinical Application.

Authors:  Stefano Lucchina; Takako Kanatani; Marco Guidi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Prosthetic Arthroplasty of Proximal Interphalangeal Joints for Treatment of Osteoarthritis and Posttraumatic Arthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Three Ulnar Digits With the Index Finger.

Authors:  Michael T Milone; Christopher S Klifto; Jacques H Hacquebord
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-08-02

5.  Outcomes of pyrolytic carbon arthroplasty for the proximal interphalangeal joint.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Ashwin N Ram; Melissa J Shauver
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Factors Associated With Reoperation After Silicone Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan Lans; Bo J W Notermans; Lazin Germawi; Hang Lee; Jesse B Jupiter; Neal C Chen
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-08-06

Review 7.  Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints.

Authors:  F A Alnaimat; H A Owida; A Al Sharah; M Alhaj; Mohammad Hassan
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.781

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.