Literature DB >> 10048512

Cubital tunnel release with endoscopic assistance: results of a new technique.

T M Tsai1, I C Chen, M E Majd, B H Lim.   

Abstract

We evaluated the results of cubital tunnel release with endoscopic assistance. The study included 76 patients (85 elbows); 47 women and 29 men. Nine patients had bilateral procedures. Patients were excluded if they had less than 1 year of follow-up, associated pathology at the elbow to account for the nerve compression, or recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome. Before surgery, cases were categorized by stage of cubital tunnel syndrome according to Dellon's classification: 33 (39%) elbows were classified as mild, 35 (41%) moderate, and 17 (20%) severe. Surgical results were assessed according to a modified Bishop rating system. The mean follow-up period was 32 months (range, 12-52 months). Results were excellent in 42% of the elbows, good in 45%, fair in 11%, and poor in 2%. Recurrence occurred in 3 elbows. There were no serious complications. The results of this study support our recommendation of cubital tunnel release with endoscopic assistance as a safe and reliable technique for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome, especially in patients with mild to moderate symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10048512     DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.jhsu25a0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  21 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Salah Aldekhayel; Alexander Govshievich; James Lee; Youssef Tahiri; Mario Luc
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-14

Review 2.  Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Authors:  Pietro Caliandro; Giuseppe La Torre; Roberto Padua; Fabio Giannini; Luca Padua
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

3.  Trends in the Surgical Treatment for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Survey of Members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.

Authors:  Ayesha Yahya; Andrew R Malarkey; Ryan L Eschbaugh; H Brent Bamberger
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-08-23

Review 4.  [Cubital tunnel syndrome : Diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  C K Spies; S Löw; M F Langer; B Hohendorff; L P Müller; F Unglaub
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Steven Cutts
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  Open Versus Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel In Situ Decompression: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Alexander Toirac; Juan M Giugale; John R Fowler
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-08-02

Review 7.  Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.907

8.  Endoscopic detection of compressing fascial bands around the ulnar nerve within the FCU.

Authors:  Daniel J Nagle; Ronak M Patel; Sonya Paisley
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-11-17

9.  [Endoscopic decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome].

Authors:  Christine Bultmann; Reimer Hoffmann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  Functional outcome after endoscopic assisted release of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: mid-to-long term results.

Authors:  Christian K Spies; Melanie Schäfer; Martin F Langer; Thomas Bruckner; Lars P Müller; Frank Unglaub
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.