Literature DB >> 10037553

Relationship of blood pressure to cardiovascular death: the effects of pulse pressure in the elderly.

M L Lee1, B A Rosner, S T Weiss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship of systolic and diastolic blood pressure to fatal myocardial infarction, fatal stroke and other death related to cardiovascular diseases (CVD).
METHODS: The study was based on a prospective longitudinal study conducted by the Veterans Administration at the Boston Outpatient Clinic. Participants are male volunteers from the greater Boston area. Main outcome measures are fatal myocardial infarction, fatal stroke and other deaths related to cardiovascular diseases. The method of pooled logistic regression was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: For younger men (age 21-59), after adjusting for effects of other risk factors, when systolic and diastolic blood pressure were considered separately, SBP was predictive of cardiovascular death (SBP: RR = 1.23; 95% CI = (1.05, 1.45) per 10 mmHg of increase), and DBP showed a nonsignificant positive trend in relation to cardiovascular death (DBP: RR = 1.27; 95% CI = (0.95, 1.69) per 10 mmHg of increase). For older men (age 60-85), when SBP and DBP were considered separately, SBP (RR = 1.26; 95% CI = (1.02, 1.55) per 15 mmHg of increase) was directly related, but DBP (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = (0.83, 1.32) per 8 mmHg of increase) was not related to cardiovascular death. However, for the elderly group, when SBP and DBP were considered jointly in the regression model, then the regression coefficient of DBP (beta = -0.018, p = 0.30) was of approximately the same absolute magnitude as that of SBP (beta = 0.021, p = 0.02) but opposite in sign. For younger men, when SBP and DBP were considered jointly, SBP (beta = 0.021, p = 0.049) but not DBP (beta = -0.001, p = 0.953) was positively related to cardiovascular death.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that, for the elderly, pulse pressure (SBP-DBP) may be a more accurate predictor of cardiovascular death than either SBP or DBP alone. The relative risk per 35 mmHg of increase of pulse pressure, which equals the approximate interval from the 10th to the 90th percentile in the elderly group, is 2.1 with 95% CI = (1.1, 3.8). In younger subjects, SBP, but not DBP, is an independent predictor of fatal CVD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10037553     DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(98)00034-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  17 in total

Review 1.  Is there a preferred antihypertensive therapy for isolated systolic hypertension and reduced arterial compliance?

Authors:  S S Franklin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Conceptual foundations of the UCSD Statin Study: a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of statins on cognition, behavior, and biochemistry.

Authors:  Beatrice Alexandra Golomb; Michael H Criqui; Halbert White; Joel E Dimsdale
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-01-26

3.  Pulse pressure amplification in relation to body fatness.

Authors:  Andrzej Wykretowicz; Agnieszka Rutkowska; Tomasz Krauze; Dagmara Przymuszala; Przemyslaw Guzik; Ryszard Marciniak; Henryk Wysocki
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Future Treatment of Hypertension: Shifting the Focus from Blood Pressure Lowering to Arterial Stiffness Modulation?

Authors:  Henry Fok; J Kennedy Cruickshank
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Pulse pressure and adverse outcomes in women: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE).

Authors:  R David Anderson; B Clay Sizemore; Genevieve M Barrow; B Delia Johnson; C Noel Bairey Merz; George Sopko; Gregory O von Mering; Eileen M Handberg; Wilmer W Nichols; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 6.  Coronary heart disease risk factors and outcomes in the twenty-first century: findings from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Monika Safford; Stephen Glasser
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Hypervolemia rather than arterial calcification and extracoronary atherosclerosis is the main determinant of pulse pressure in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Halil Yazici; Huseyin Oflaz; Hamdi Pusuroglu; Savas Tepe; Cengiz Dogan; Ali Basci; Vakur Akkaya; Alaattin Yildiz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Biological effects of bariatric surgery on obesity-related comorbidities.

Authors:  Sabrena F Noria; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  The J-curve in hypertension.

Authors:  John Cruickshank
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Retinal emboli and cardiovascular disease: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Scot E Moss; Stacy M Meuer
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.