Literature DB >> 10037102

Post-therapy serum prostate-specific antigen level and survival in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer.

H I Scher1, W M Kelly, Z F Zhang, P Ouyang, M Sun, M Schwartz, C Ding, W Wang, I D Horak, A B Kremer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With an hypothesis that post-chemotherapy changes in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels might serve as a surrogate marker for assessing prostate cancer outcome (i.e., survival), we studied the relationship between pretherapy and post-therapy prognostic factors and survival in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer.
METHODS: A prognostic model for survival based on pretherapy and post-therapy parameters was developed from the clinical data on 254 patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer treated with 11 different protocol therapies at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The model was validated by use of an independent dataset of 541 patients enrolled in two randomized phase III trials.
RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, a post-therapy decline in PSA levels of 50% achieved in 12 weeks was a statistically significant factor associated with survival (two-sided P = .0012). A similar outcome was obtained with the use of an 8-week time frame. Elevated pretherapy level of serum lactate dehydrogenase (two-sided P = .0001), lower pretherapy level of hemoglobin (P = .0001), and younger age (two-sided P = .0430) had a statistically significant negative impact on outcome. Median survival times were 23, 17, and 9 months for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups of patients defined by the prognostic model, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the prognostic value of a post-therapy decline in PSA of 50% or greater from baseline in relation to survival in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer treated with a variety of therapies. Two consecutive determinations at 4-week intervals can be used as an end point for efficacy in phase II trials of therapies in this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10037102     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/91.3.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  29 in total

Review 1.  A history of prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Samuel R Denmeade; John T Isaacs
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Radiation safety considerations for the use of ²²³RaCl₂ DE in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Matthew J Williamson; John Humm; Joseph O'Donoghue; Rashid Ghani; Robert Awadallah; Jorge Carrasquillo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Anne-Kirsti Aksnes; Colin Biggin; Vigdis Reinton; Michael Morris; Jean St Germain
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Phase II trial of simple oral therapy with capecitabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer: SWOG S0430.

Authors:  Anne F Schott; William E Barlow; Kathy S Albain; Helen K Chew; James L Wade; Keith S Lanier; Danika L Lew; Daniel F Hayes; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-01-20

Review 4.  PSA response rate as a surrogate marker for median overall survival in docetaxel-based first-line treatments for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of 22 trials.

Authors:  Edoardo Francini; Roberto Petrioli; Giulia Rossi; Letizia Laera; Giandomenico Roviello
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-09-07

5.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry detects disease- and treatment-related alterations of bone density in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  G L Smith; A P Doherty; L M Banks; J Dutton; L W Hanham; T J Christmas; R J Epstein
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 6.  Immunotherapy in prostate cancer: emerging strategies against a formidable foe.

Authors:  Marijo Bilusic; Christopher Heery; Ravi A Madan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as an outcome measure for castrate metastatic prostate cancer treated with antimicrotubule chemotherapy.

Authors:  Michael J Morris; Timothy Akhurst; Steven M Larson; Marisa Ditullio; Elaina Chu; Karen Siedlecki; David Verbel; Glenn Heller; W Kevin Kelly; Susan Slovin; Lawrence Schwartz; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  False-positive diagnosis of disease progression by magnetic resonance imaging for response assessment in prostate cancer with bone metastases: A case report and review of the pitfalls of images in the literature.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Yu; Wan-Hu Li; Ming-Huan Li; Xue Meng; L I Kong; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Investigation of risk factors for prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis based on clinical data.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Yamada; Katsuya Naruse; Kogenta Nakamura; Tomohiro Taki; Motoi Tobiume; Kenji Zennami; Genya Nishikawa; Youko Itoh; Yoshitaka Muramatsu; Hiroshi Nanaura; Miho Nishimura; Kazuko Takii; Adnan Odhafa Kh Adham; Nobuaki Honda
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Cost effectiveness of risk-prediction tools in selecting patients for immediate post-prostatectomy treatment.

Authors:  Valentina Bayer Zubek; Andre Konski
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.