Literature DB >> 10036221

Physicochemical differences in the AH receptors of the most TCDD-susceptible and the most TCDD-resistant rat strains.

R Pohjanvirta1, M Viluksela, J T Tuomisto, M Unkila, J Karasinska, M A Franc, M Holowenko, J V Giannone, P A Harper, J Tuomisto, A B Okey.   

Abstract

Long-Evans rats (strain Turku AB; L-E) are at least 1000-fold more sensitive (LD50 about 10 microg/kg) to the acute lethal effects of 2, 3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) than are Han/Wistar (Kuopio; H/W) rats (LD50 > 9600 microg/kg). The AH receptor (AHR) is believed to mediate the toxic effects of TCDD and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. We compared the AHRs of L-E and H/W rats to determine if there were any structural or functional receptor differences that might be related to the dramatic difference in the sensitivity of these two strains to the lethal effects of TCDD. Cytosols from liver and lung of the sensitive L-E rats contained about twofold higher levels of specific binding sites for [3H]TCDD than occurred in H/W rats; the Kd for binding of [3H]TCDD to AHR in hepatic cytosols was similar between the two strains. Addition of the oxyanions, molybdate or tungstate (20 mM), had little effect upon ligand binding to AHR in hepatic cytosols from L-E rats whereas in cytosols from H/W rats these agents substantially diminished or totally abolished TCDD binding. The AHR in H/W cytosols also lost ligand-binding function when NaCl (20 to 400 mM) was added to the buffer whereas, in cytosols from L-E rats, the addition of 400 mM NaCl caused the receptor complex to shift from 9S to 6S during velocity sedimentation but did not destroy ligand binding function. AHR from hepatic cytosol of both the L-E and H/W rats could be transformed to the DNA-binding state in the presence of TCDD or other dioxin congeners as assessed by gel mobility shift assays. The most dramatic difference in AHR properties between L-E and H/W rats is molecular mass. Immunoblotting of cytosolic proteins revealed that the AHR in L-E rats has an apparent mass of approximately 106 kDa, similar to the mass of the receptor previously reported in several other common laboratory rat strains. In contrast, the mass of the AHR in H/W rats is approximately 98 kDa, significantly smaller than the mass of receptor reported in any other rat strains. F1 offspring of a cross between L-E and H/W rats expressed both the 106- and the 98-kDa protein. There was no apparent difference in the mass of the AHR nuclear translocator protein (ARNT) between the two strains, but the hepatic concentration of ARNT was about three times as high in L-E as in H/W rats. It will be interesting to find out how the altered structure of the AHR in H/W rats is related to their remarkable resistance to the lethal effects of TCDD. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10036221     DOI: 10.1006/taap.1998.8565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  16 in total

1.  Common mechanism underlies repeated evolution of extreme pollution tolerance.

Authors:  Andrew Whitehead; Whitney Pilcher; Denise Champlin; Diane Nacci
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Dioxin: a review of its environmental effects and its aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology.

Authors:  Prabir K Mandal
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-regulated transcriptomic changes in rats sensitive or resistant to major dioxin toxicities.

Authors:  Ivy D Moffat; Paul C Boutros; Hanbo Chen; Allan B Okey; Raimo Pohjanvirta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Toxicogenomic evaluation of long-term hepatic effects of TCDD in immature, ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Anna K Kopec; Darrell R Boverhof; Rance Nault; Jack R Harkema; Colleen Tashiro; Dave Potter; Bonnie Sharratt; Brock Chittim; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling by cotton balls used for environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Shelley A Tischkau; Motoko Mukai
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Recombinant expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor for quantitative ligand-binding analysis.

Authors:  Ming Qi Fan; Alex R Bell; David R Bell; Sally Clode; Alwyn Fernandes; Paul M D Foster; Jeffrey R Fry; Tao Jiang; George Loizou; Alan MacNicoll; Brian G Miller; Martin Rose; Osama Shaikh-Omar; Lang Tran; Shaun White
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 7.  Animal models of endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Suzanne E Fenton; David Aylor
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.690

8.  Induction of oxidative stress responses by dioxin and other ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  John F Reichard; Timothy P Dalton; Howard G Shertzer; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 9.  Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME.

Authors:  Patricio Godoy; Nicola J Hewitt; Ute Albrecht; Melvin E Andersen; Nariman Ansari; Sudin Bhattacharya; Johannes Georg Bode; Jennifer Bolleyn; Christoph Borner; Jan Böttger; Albert Braeuning; Robert A Budinsky; Britta Burkhardt; Neil R Cameron; Giovanni Camussi; Chong-Su Cho; Yun-Jaie Choi; J Craig Rowlands; Uta Dahmen; Georg Damm; Olaf Dirsch; María Teresa Donato; Jian Dong; Steven Dooley; Dirk Drasdo; Rowena Eakins; Karine Sá Ferreira; Valentina Fonsato; Joanna Fraczek; Rolf Gebhardt; Andrew Gibson; Matthias Glanemann; Chris E P Goldring; María José Gómez-Lechón; Geny M M Groothuis; Lena Gustavsson; Christelle Guyot; David Hallifax; Seddik Hammad; Adam Hayward; Dieter Häussinger; Claus Hellerbrand; Philip Hewitt; Stefan Hoehme; Hermann-Georg Holzhütter; J Brian Houston; Jens Hrach; Kiyomi Ito; Hartmut Jaeschke; Verena Keitel; Jens M Kelm; B Kevin Park; Claus Kordes; Gerd A Kullak-Ublick; Edward L LeCluyse; Peng Lu; Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler; Anna Lutz; Daniel J Maltman; Madlen Matz-Soja; Patrick McMullen; Irmgard Merfort; Simon Messner; Christoph Meyer; Jessica Mwinyi; Dean J Naisbitt; Andreas K Nussler; Peter Olinga; Francesco Pampaloni; Jingbo Pi; Linda Pluta; Stefan A Przyborski; Anup Ramachandran; Vera Rogiers; Cliff Rowe; Celine Schelcher; Kathrin Schmich; Michael Schwarz; Bijay Singh; Ernst H K Stelzer; Bruno Stieger; Regina Stöber; Yuichi Sugiyama; Ciro Tetta; Wolfgang E Thasler; Tamara Vanhaecke; Mathieu Vinken; Thomas S Weiss; Agata Widera; Courtney G Woods; Jinghai James Xu; Kathy M Yarborough; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  mRNA levels in control rat liver display strain-specific, hereditary, and AHR-dependent components.

Authors:  Paul C Boutros; Ivy D Moffat; Allan B Okey; Raimo Pohjanvirta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.