Literature DB >> 10030717

Detection of viruses and body fluids which may contain viruses in the domestic environment.

K Bellamy1, K L Laban, K E Barrett, D C Talbot.   

Abstract

The domestic environment was investigated for the presence of viruses and body fluids that may contain viruses. A range of surfaces in 39 homes (17 visited on 2 occasions) were sampled by swabbing and analysed using cell culture, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for enteroviral RNA, haemoglobin as a marker for blood, amylase as an indicator of urine, saliva and sweat, and protein as an indicator of general hygiene. Haemoglobin was found on 1.9% of surfaces sampled and of the positive samples 30% were from articles frequently handled. Amylase (> 5 U/l) was found in 29.3% of samples tested. Protein was found in 97.8% of samples tested. Enteroviral RNA, indicating the presence of virus, was detected in 3 out of 448 samples tested; they were from a tap handle, telephone handpiece and a toilet bowl. No viruses were isolated in cell culture, however significant problems were encountered with bacterial and fungal contamination. This work demonstrates that only testing environmental samples for bacteria and ATP may not give a total view of the microbiological problem in the home. A range of test methods is useful to gain a broad view of the problems of hygiene in the home and to allow comparative studies of specific areas such as the kitchen and bathroom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10030717      PMCID: PMC2809575          DOI: 10.1017/s0950268898001678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  8 in total

Review 1.  Significance of fomites in the spread of respiratory and enteric viral disease.

Authors:  Stephanie A Boone; Charles P Gerba
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Transfer efficiency of bacteria and viruses from porous and nonporous fomites to fingers under different relative humidity conditions.

Authors:  Gerardo U Lopez; Charles P Gerba; Akrum H Tamimi; Masaaki Kitajima; Sheri L Maxwell; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of surface sampling methods for virus recovery from fomites.

Authors:  Timothy R Julian; Francisco J Tamayo; James O Leckie; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Cell phones and Acinetobacter transmission.

Authors:  Abraham Borer; Jacob Gilad; Rozalia Smolyakov; Seada Eskira; Nechama Peled; Nurith Porat; Eytan Hyam; Ronit Trefler; Klaris Riesenberg; Francisc Schlaeffer
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Spread and prevention of some common viral infections in community facilities and domestic homes.

Authors:  J Barker; D Stevens; S F Bloomfield
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens?

Authors:  Fatma Ulger; Saban Esen; Ahmet Dilek; Keramettin Yanik; Murat Gunaydin; Hakan Leblebicioglu
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Bactericidal and sporicidal performance of a polymer-encapsulated chlorine dioxide-coated surface.

Authors:  W K Leung; A P S Lau; K L Yeung
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Bacterial contamination of mobile phones of healthcare workers at the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.

Authors:  N A Mushabati; M T Samutela; K Yamba; J Ngulube; R Nakazwe; P Nkhoma; A Kalonda
Journal:  Infect Prev Pract       Date:  2021-02-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.