Literature DB >> 10030682

Age-dependent changes in physiological threshold asymmetries for the motor evoked potential and silent period following transcranial magnetic stimulation.

K Matsunaga1, T Uozumi, S Tsuji, Y Murai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of age on the physiological threshold asymmetries for the motor evoked potential (MEP) and silent period (SP) following transcranial magnetic stimulation.
METHODS: We studied 63 right-handed subjects and 13 young left-handed subjects (19-39 years). The right-handers were classified into three age groups; 22 young (20-38 years), 20 middle-aged (40-58 years) and 21 old (61-82 years) subjects. We measured the MEP thresholds at rest and during voluntary contraction (VC), and the SP thresholds from the right and left abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles. We also measured the side to side differences of the F wave persistency and the F wave/M wave amplitude ratio from the same muscles.
RESULTS: Among young subjects, all of the MEP and SP thresholds for the right APB were significantly lower than those for the left APB in the right-handers, and the reverse was true in the left-handers. The results in the middle-aged right-handers were similar to those in the young right-handers, but in the old right-handers, none of the thresholds were different between the two sides. We did not find any asymmetries of the F wave in the subjects of any age group.
CONCLUSION: We speculate that the age-dependent threshold asymmetries are preferentially related to functional asymmetries at the cortical level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10030682     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00020-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  13 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  [Cortical excitability in schizophrenia. Studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation].

Authors:  T Wobrock; D Kadovic; P Falkai
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Intracortical inhibition and facilitation with unilateral dominant, unilateral nondominant and bilateral movement tasks in left- and right-handed adults.

Authors:  Sandy McCombe Waller; Larry Forrester; Federico Villagra; Jill Whitall
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  Laterality of interhemispheric inhibition depends on handedness.

Authors:  T Bäumer; E Dammann; F Bock; S Klöppel; H R Siebner; A Münchau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Age and gender effects on submental motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Oshrat Sella; Richard D Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-12-11

6.  Long-interval intracortical inhibition is asymmetric in young but not older adults.

Authors:  A-M Vallence; E Smalley; P D Drummond; G R Hammond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A meta-analysis of the effects of aging on motor cortex neurophysiology assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Apoorva Bhandari; Natasha Radhu; Faranak Farzan; Benoit H Mulsant; Tarek K Rajji; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Statistical Model of Motor-Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; S M Mahdi Alavi; Zhi-De Deng; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in children.

Authors:  Marjorie A Garvey; Volker Mall
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Cortical mapping of the infraspinatus muscle in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Suzy Ngomo; Catherine Mercier; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.