Literature DB >> 10030254

Decrease in cranial nerve complications after radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas: a prospective study of dose and volume.

R C Miller1, R L Foote, R J Coffey, D J Sargent, D A Gorman, P J Schomberg, R W Kline.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether tumor control can be maintained, and cranial nerve complications decreased by reducing the radiosurgical dose to acoustic neuromas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-two consecutive patients with acoustic neuromas were treated prospectively using an initial standard-dose protocol in which the tumor-margin dose (50% isodose) was 20, 18, and 16 Gy for tumor diameters < or =2 cm, 2.1-3 cm, and 3.1-4 cm, respectively. After analysis of tumor control and complications, the next 40 patients were treated using a reduced-dose protocol in which the tumor-margin dose was 16, 14, and 12 Gy for tumor volumes < or =4.2 cm3, 4.2-14.1 cm3, and > or =14.1 cm3, respectively.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range 0.1-6) for 80 of 82 patients. The actuarial incidence (Kaplan-Meier) of facial neuropathy at 2 years was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23-53%) for the standard-dose protocol and 8% (95% CI, 0-17%) for the reduced-dose protocol (p = 0.006). Univariate analysis revealed an association between risk of facial neuropathy and use of CT planning, higher radiosurgical dose, and neurofibromatosis, type 2. Multivariate analysis revealed that the only factor associated with increased risk of post-treatment facial neuropathy was a tumor margin dose > or =18 Gy. The incidence of trigeminal neuropathy at 2 years was 29% (95% CI, 15-43%) for the standard-dose protocol and 15% (95% CI, 3-27%) for the reduced-dose protocol (p = 0.17). Univariate analysis revealed an association between maximal tumor diameter and increased risk of trigeminal neuropathy; multivariate analysis revealed no additional statistically significant associations between tumor and dosimetric and patient characteristics and risk of trigeminal neuropathy. Two tumors in the standard-dose protocol required salvage surgery for progression. To date, no tumor in the reduced-dose protocol has shown progression.
CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that a tumor margin dose of > or =18 Gy is the most significant risk factor for facial nerve complications after acoustic neuroma radiosurgery. Patients receiving a minimal tumor dose of < or =16 Gy are at significantly lower risk for permanent facial neuropathy after radiosurgery. Longer follow-up is required before definitive conclusions can be made about the ultimate rate of tumor control using reduced radiosurgical doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10030254     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00397-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Low-Dose Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control and Cranial Nerve Function Preservation After 11 Gy.

Authors:  Andrew J Schumacher; Rohan R Lall; Rishi R Lall; Allan Nanney; Amit Ayer; Samir Sejpal; Benjamin P Liu; Maryanne Marymont; Plato Lee; Bernard R Bendok; John A Kalapurakal; James P Chandler
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-05-31

2.  Surgical management of vestibular schwannomas after failed radiation treatment.

Authors:  Yoichi Nonaka; Takanori Fukushima; Kentaro Watanabe; Allan H Friedman; Calhoun D Cunningham; Ali R Zomorodi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Benjamin J Arthurs; Wayne T Lamoreaux; Neil A Giddings; Robert K Fairbanks; Alexander R Mackay; John J Demakas; Barton S Cooke; Christopher M Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Tumor pseudoprogression following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Caroline Hayhurst; Gelareh Zadeh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  A review of treatment modalities for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Benjamin J Arthurs; Robert K Fairbanks; John J Demakas; Wayne T Lamoreaux; Neil A Giddings; Alexander R Mackay; Barton S Cooke; Ameer L Elaimy; Christopher M Lee
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Dosimetric comparison of Linac-based (BrainLAB®) and robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife ®) stereotactic system plans for acoustic schwannoma.

Authors:  Debnarayan Dutta; S Balaji Subramanian; V Murli; H Sudahar; P G Gopalakrishna Kurup; Mahadev Potharaju
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Facial nerve preservation after vestibular schwannoma Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Isaac Yang; Michael E Sughrue; Seunggu J Han; Shanna Fang; Derick Aranda; Steven W Cheung; Lawrence H Pitts; Andrew T Parsa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Impact of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation following Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Lawrance K Chung; Nolan Ung; John P Sheppard; Thien Nguyen; Carlito Lagman; Winward Choy; Stephen Tenn; Nader Pouratian; Percy Lee; Tania Kaprealian; Michael Selch; Antonio De Salles; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 9.  Wide field retinal imaging and the detection of drug associated retinal toxicity.

Authors:  Giulia Corradetti; Sara Violanti; Adrian Au; David Sarraf
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2019-12-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.