Literature DB >> 10030250

Hyperfractionated craniospinal radiation therapy for primitive neuroectodermal tumors: results of a Phase II study.

M D Prados1, M S Edwards, S M Chang, C Russo, R Davis, J Rabbitt, M Page, K Lamborn, W M Wara.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the results of a Phase II study of hyperfractionated craniospinal radiation therapy, with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for primitive neuroectodermal brain tumors (PNETs) and malignant ependymomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Newly diagnosed PNET or malignant ependymomas were treated with hyperfractionated craniospinal radiation therapy. The primary tumor site was treated to a dose of 72 Gy, with 30 Gy given to the rest of the craniospinal axis. The fraction size was 1.0 Gy, given twice a day. Patients with poor risk factors also received adjuvant chemotherapy with CCNU, cisplatin, and vincristine. Patients had follow-up for survival, time to tumor progression, and patterns of relapse.
RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (21 males/18 females) were treated between March 12, 1990 and October 29, 1992. The median age was 16 years (range 3-59 years). Tumor types included 25 medulloblastomas, 5 pineoblastomas, 5 cerebral PNETs, 1 spinal cord PNET, and 3 malignant ependymomas. Twenty cases were staged as poor-risk and received adjuvant chemotherapy following radiation. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 60% and 63% for poor-risk and good-risk patients, respectively. Overall 3-year survival for these groups was 70% and 79%, respectively. For the 25 patients with medulloblastoma, there were 16 good-risk and 9 poor-risk patients. Three-year PFSs were 63% and 56%, respectively. The 5-year survival for good-risk medulloblastoma was 69% with 43.7% of these patients having failures outside the primary site.
CONCLUSIONS: Survival in patients with good-risk medulloblastoma was no better than that seen in previous studies with single-fraction radiation, and the rate of failure outside the primary site is excessive. Those with poor-risk features had comparable survival to that seen in patients with good risk factors, but these patients were treated with chemotherapy, and the role that hyperfractionated radiation played in their outcome is uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10030250     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00413-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

Review 1.  Emerging treatments and gene expression profiling in high-risk medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Iacopo Sardi; Duccio Cavalieri; Maura Massimino
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Catherine A. Mazzola; Ian F. Pollack
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Primary intraspinal primitive neuroectodermal tumor: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Clemens F Albrecht; Elisabeth Weiss; Walter J Schulz-Schaeffer; Tanja Albrecht; Susanne Fauser; Jürgen Wickboldt; Clemens F Hess
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Medulloblastoma in children: a 32-year experience from a single institution.

Authors:  Canan Akyüz; Ali Varan; Serhan Küpeli; Nejat Akalan; Figen Söylemezoglu; Faruk Zorlu; Tezer Kutluk; Münevver Büyükpamukçu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  A phase II study of preradiotherapy chemotherapy followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy for newly diagnosed high-risk medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor: a report from the Children's Oncology Group (CCG 9931).

Authors:  Jeffrey Allen; Bernadine Donahue; Minesh Mehta; Douglas C Miller; Lucy B Rorke; Regina Jakacki; Patricia Robertson; Richard Sposto; Emi Holmes; Gilbert Vezina; Karin Muraszko; Diane Puccetti; Michael Prados; Ka-Wah Chan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Neurocognitive function after radiotherapy for paediatric brain tumours.

Authors:  Laetitia Padovani; Nicolas André; Louis S Constine; Xavier Muracciole
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Primary pineal tumors: outcome and prognostic factors--a study from the Rare Cancer Network (RCN).

Authors:  Salvador Villà; Robert C Miller; Marco Krengli; Huda Abusaris; Brigitta G Baumert; Stephanie Servagi-Vernat; Sefik Igdem; Anna Lucas; Susanna Boluda; René O Mirimanoff
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Current therapy for medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Nicholas G Gottardo; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.972

9.  A supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor presenting with intracranial hemorrhage in a 42-year-old man: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Evangelos K Papadopoulos; Kostas N Fountas; Alexandros G Brotis; Konstantinos N Paterakis
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-03-27

Review 10.  A supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor in an adult: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Shigeo Ohba; Kazunari Yoshida; Yuichi Hirose; Eiji Ikeda; Takeshi Kawase
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 4.506

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.