Literature DB >> 10030176

Arthritis self-management program variations: three studies.

K Lorig1, V M González, D D Laurent, L Morgan, B A Laris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) Determine strengths and weaknesses of the Arthritis Self-Management Program (ASMP). 2) Compare 3- and 6-week ASMP. 3) Evaluate 1.5-hour arthritis program.
METHODS: Study 1: Qualitative methods incorporating incomplete block design. Study 2: Comparison of 3- and 6-week outcomes. Study 3: Pretest/posttest comparison.
RESULTS: Study 1: Pain management, exercise, and sharing ranked as the most useful aspects of the ASMP. Nutrition, medications, and making decisions about nontraditional treatments ranked least useful. Study 2: Six-week ASMP subjects improved pain, health distress, illness impact, exercise, cognitive pain management, self-efficacy, and reduced visits to physicians (P < 0.05). Three-week subjects improved health distress, cognitive pain management, and self-efficacy (P < 0.05). Study 3: Improved knowledge, self-efficacy, and pain (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The traditional 6-week ASMP is more effective than a 3-week version. A 1.5-hour community program is effective in increasing knowledge, self-efficacy, and contact with the Arthritis Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10030176     DOI: 10.1002/art.1790110604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res        ISSN: 0893-7524


  31 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of patient education interventions to increase physical activity among chronically ill adults.

Authors:  Vicki S Conn; Adam R Hafdahl; Sharon A Brown; Lori M Brown
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-11-26

2.  The Challenge of Pain for Patients with OA.

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-01-27

Review 3.  Self-management in lower urinary tract symptoms: the next major therapeutic revolution.

Authors:  T L Yap; C T Brown; M Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Using the theoretical domains framework to guide the development of a self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury: Results from a national stakeholder advisory group.

Authors:  Sarah E P Munce; Sonya Allin; Dalton L Wolfe; Karen Anzai; Gary Linassi; Vanessa K Noonan; Susan B Jaglal
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Treatment expectation for pain coping skills training: relationship to osteoarthritis patients' baseline psychosocial characteristics.

Authors:  Joan E Broderick; Doerte U Junghaenel; Stefan Schneider; Patricia Bruckenthal; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Lack of benefit of a primary care-based nurse-led education programme for people with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Christina R Victor; Eric Triggs; Fiona Ross; Joanne Lord; John S Axford
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Preferences for arthritis interventions: identifying similarities and differences among African Americans and whites with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Chivon A Mingo; Jessica M McIlvane; Malcolm Jefferson; Lloyd J Edwards; William E Haley
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  Relationship of intermuscular fat volume in the thigh with knee extensor strength and physical performance in women at risk of or with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Monica R Maly; Kristina M Calder; Norma J Macintyre; Karen A Beattie
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Barriers and facilitators to chronic pain self-management: a qualitative study of primary care patients with comorbid musculoskeletal pain and depression.

Authors:  Matthew J Bair; Marianne S Matthias; Kathryn A Nyland; Monica A Huffman; Dawana L Stubbs; Kurt Kroenke; Teresa M Damush
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Effectiveness of two Arthritis Foundation programs: Walk With Ease, and YOU Can Break the Pain Cycle.

Authors:  Michelle Bruno; Susan Cummins; Lisha Gaudiano; Johanna Stoos; Peter Blanpied
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.