Literature DB >> 10029499

Can restrictions on reimbursement for anti-ulcer drugs decrease Medicaid pharmacy costs without increasing hospitalizations?

D M Cromwell1, E B Bass, E P Steinberg, Y Yasui, W J Ravich, T R Hendrix, S F McLeod, R D Moore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of a policy restricting reimbursement for Medicaid anti-ulcer drugs on anti-ulcer drug use and peptic-related hospitalizations. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: In addition to U.S. Census Bureau data, all of the following from Florida: Medicaid anti-ulcer drug claims data, 1989-1993; Medicaid eligibility data, 1989-1993; and acute care nonfederal hospital discharge abstract data (Medicaid and non-Medicaid), 1989-1993. STUDY
DESIGN: In this observational study, a Poisson multiple regression model was used to compare changes, after policy implementation, in Medicaid reimbursement for prescription anti-ulcer drugs as well as hospitalization rates between pre- and post-implementation periods in Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer disease. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Following policy implementation, the rate of Medicaid reimbursement for anti-ulcer drugs decreased 33 percent (p < .001). No associated increase occurred in the rate of Medicaid peptic-related hospitalizations.
CONCLUSIONS: Florida's policy restricting Medicaid reimbursement for anti-ulcer drugs was associated with a substantial reduction in outpatient anti-ulcer drug utilization without any significant increase in the rate of hospitalization for peptic-related conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10029499      PMCID: PMC1070338     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  12 in total

1.  Double-blind randomized multicenter study comparing Maalox TC tablets and ranitidine in healing of duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  J O Hunter; R J Walker; J Crowe; R R Gillies; K R Gillies; K R Gough; S Lorber
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  A critical analysis of studies of state drug reimbursement policies: research in need of discipline.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; D Ross-Degnan; E E Fortess; J Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Pharmacists' reactions to the Wisconsin Medicaid drug-use review program.

Authors:  C M Brown; E E Lipowski
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1993-09

4.  Payment restrictions for prescription drugs under Medicaid. Effects on therapy, cost, and equity.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; J Avorn; D Ross-Degnan; S Gortmaker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prophylactic effect of cimetidine in duodenal ulcer disease.

Authors:  E Gudmand-Høyer; K B Jensen; E Krag; J Rask-Madsen; I Rahbek; S J Rune; H R Wulff
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-04-29

6.  Cimetidine and perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  A J McKay; C S McArdle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Antacids for peptic ulcer: do we have anything better?

Authors:  A Berstad; R Weberg
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1986

8.  Effects of a limiting Medicaid drug-reimbursement benefits on the use of psychotropic agents and acute mental health services by patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; T J McLaughlin; D Ross-Degnan; C S Casteris; P Bollini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Effects of Medicaid drug-payment limits on admission to hospitals and nursing homes.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; D Ross-Degnan; J Avorn; T j McLaughlin; I Choodnovskiy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Incidence of perforated and bleeding peptic ulcers before and after the introduction of H2-receptor antagonists.

Authors:  A Christensen; R Bousfield; J Christiansen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacy utilization and the Medicare Modernization Act.

Authors:  Vittorio Maio; Laura Pizzi; Adam R Roumm; Janice Clarke; Neil I Goldfarb; David B Nash; David Chess
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Making a case for employing a societal perspective in the evaluation of Medicaid prescription drug interventions.

Authors:  Sanjoy Roy; S Suresh Madhavan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Impact of Medicaid preferred drug lists on therapeutic adherence.

Authors:  David B Ridley; Kirsten J Axelsen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Prevalence of anti-ulcer drug use in a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Tzeng-Ji Chen; Li-Fang Chou; Shinn-Jang Hwang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.