Literature DB >> 10029481

Prospective comparison of axial computed tomography and standard and panoramic radiographs in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures.

B L Markowitz1, J D Sinow, H K Kawamoto, K Shewmake, F Khoumehr.   

Abstract

Objective data comparing sensitivity and accuracy between traditional and computed imaging techniques used for diagnosing mandibular fractures is sparse. To address the paucity of information the authors studied prospectively 33 mandibular fractures in 21 consecutive patients with standard mandibular series, panoramic tomography, axial computed tomography (CT), and coronal CT. Differences in diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity as compiled by four blinded reviewers were calculated. Although overall sensitivities of mandibular fracture detection were not statistically significant between the imaging studies, a distinction between the four methods did exist. Coronal CT was the most accurate imaging method, followed by mandibular series, panoramic topography, and axial CT. Excluding technically inadequate studies, panoramic tomography was 100% accurate and sensitive. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity did not correlate measurably with reviewers' impressions of the quality of a particular exam. Axial CT detected significantly fewer angle fractures than standard radiographs (60% vs. 98%, p = 0.006) and coronal CT (60% vs. 100%, p = 0.008). False-positives were unusual except for plain mandibular radiographs. The clear definition of both coronal and axial CT scans made their analysis simpler than the plain radiographs. Lack of fracture displacement was the single most important factor in missed fractures with all modalities. Despite reviewer concerns about the quality of the plain mandibular series, the high accuracy and sensitivity of this imaging technique and applicability in all patients, coupled with its low cost, make it an excellent screening exam for all patients with suspected mandibular fractures. In clinically stable and cooperative patients with mandibular trauma, panoramic radiography and coronal CT are recommended to confirm clinical suspicions when the mandibular series is equivocal. To supplement the mandibular series in the uncooperative or multisystem trauma patient, axial CT scans have not been beneficial. These diagnostic modalities do not obviate the need for a careful physical exam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10029481     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199902000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  4 in total

1.  Preauricular Swelling Mimicking a Tumour: Dissolution of Mandibular Capitulum Following Trauma in a 15-Year Old Child.

Authors:  Reinhard E Friedrich; Felix K Kohlrusch
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Recent advances in imaging technologies in dentistry.

Authors:  Naseem Shah; Nikhil Bansal; Ajay Logani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28

3.  Study of Patterns of Maxillofacial Injuries: An Institution-based Observational Study.

Authors:  Leslie Sara Mathew Kalathil; Ummar Mangalath; A Roshni; Sachin Aslam; Tom Thomas; Rakesh B Nair
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  Ujuzi (Practical Pearl/Perle Pratique).

Authors:  Kwame Ekremet; Maxwell Osei-Ampofo; Reginald Sefah Nkansah; Kwasi Owusu Offei; Kwabena Antwi-Donkor; Peggy Asiedu Ekremet
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.