Literature DB >> 10027000

Instability at chromosomal fragile sites.

T W Glover1.   

Abstract

Chromosomal fragile sites are loci that are especially prone to forming gaps or breaks on metaphase chromosomes when cells are cultured under conditions that inhibit DNA replication or repair. The relationship of "rare" folate sensitive fragile sites with (CCG)n expansion and, in some cases, genetic disease is well established. Although they comprise the vast majority of fragile sites, much less is known at the molecular level about the "common" fragile sites. These fragile sites may be seen on all chromosomes as a constant feature. In addition to forming fragile sites on metaphase chromosomes, they have been shown to display a number of characteristics of unstable and highly recombinogenic DNA in vitro, including chromosome rearrangements, sister chromatid exchanges and, more recently, intrachromosomal gene amplification. Only one such fragile site, FRA3B at 3p14.2, has been extensively investigated at the molecular level. It extends over a broad region of possibly 500 kb, and no trinucleotide or other simple repeat motifs have been identified in the region. FRA3B has recently been shown to lie within the FHIT gene locus. This region and the FHIT gene are unstable in a number of tumors and tumor cell lines. It thus appears that common fragile sites are also associated with unstable regions of DNA in vivo, at least in some tumor cells, and may cause this instability. Current challenges include determining the mechanism of fragile site expression and instability, and both the environmental and genetic factors that influence this process. Candidate factors include those genes involved in DNA repair and cell cycle and common carcinogens such as those in cigarette smoke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10027000     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-46870-4_11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res        ISSN: 0080-0015


  12 in total

1.  Enhanced flexibility and aphidicolin-induced DNA breaks near mammalian replication origins: implications for replicon mapping and chromosome fragility.

Authors:  F Toledo; A Coquelle; E Svetlova; M Debatisse
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Molecular basis for expression of common and rare fragile sites.

Authors:  Eitan Zlotorynski; Ayelet Rahat; Jennifer Skaug; Neta Ben-Porat; Efrat Ozeri; Ruth Hershberg; Ayala Levi; Stephen W Scherer; Hanah Margalit; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest.

Authors:  Sally L Davies; Phillip S North; Alwyn Dart; Nicholas D Lakin; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  The common fragile site FRA16D gene product WWOX: roles in tumor suppression and genomic stability.

Authors:  Rami I Aqeilan; Muhannad Abu-Remaileh; Mohammad Abu-Odeh
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Genomic instability in the PARK2 locus is associated with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Wojciech Ambroziak; Dariusz Koziorowski; Kinga Duszyc; Paulina Górka-Skoczylas; Anna Potulska-Chromik; Jarosław Sławek; Dorota Hoffman-Zacharska
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Maternal benzene exposure during pregnancy and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Yanfeng Zhou; Shaozun Zhang; Zhen Li; Jie Zhu; Yongyi Bi; YuE Bai; Hong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  High chromosomal instability in workers occupationally exposed to solvents and paint removers.

Authors:  Mónica Villalba-Campos; Lilian Chuaire-Noack; Magda Carolina Sánchez-Corredor; Milena Rondón-Lagos
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Mammalian RAD51 paralogs protect nascent DNA at stalled forks and mediate replication restart.

Authors:  Kumar Somyajit; Sneha Saxena; Sharath Babu; Anup Mishra; Ganesh Nagaraju
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Tumor Suppressor Genes within Common Fragile Sites Are Active Players in the DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Idit Hazan; Thomas G Hofmann; Rami I Aqeilan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Effects of Replication and Transcription on DNA Structure-Related Genetic Instability.

Authors:  Guliang Wang; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.