Literature DB >> 10026745

Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial.

S Benoist1, Y Panis, C Denet, F Mauvais, P Mariani, P Valleur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Voiding dysfunction is frequently observed after rectal resection and justifies urinary drainage. However, there is no agreement about the optimal duration of this postoperative drainage. The aim of this controlled trial was to compare 1 versus 5 days of transurethral catheterization after rectal resection, with special reference to urinary tract infection and bladder retention.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients undergoing rectal resection were included in a prospective randomized study designed to compare the results for patients undergoing 1 day of transurethral catheterization after rectal resection (1-day group) with those for patients undergoing 5 days' catheterization (5-day group).
RESULTS: Patients were randomly assigned to the 1-day and 5-day groups (n = 64 and 62, respectively). Clinical findings and surgical procedures were comparable in both groups. Acute urinary retention occurred in 16 patients (25%) in the 1-day group versus 6 (10%) in the 5-day group (P < .05). Urinary tract infection was observed in 13 of 64 patients (20%) in the 1-day group versus 26 of 62 (42%) in the 5-day group (P < .01). Multivariate analysis revealed that after 1 day of catheterization carcinoma of the low rectum and lymph node metastasis were significant risk factors for acute urinary retention (P < .05 for both factors). After selection of patients without low rectum carcinoma, the acute urinary retention rate was comparable in both groups (14% in the 1-day group versus 7% in the 5-day group), but the urinary tract infection rate was significantly lower in the 1-day group versus the 5-day group (14% vs 40, P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our controlled study showed that after rectal resection 1 day of urinary drainage can be recommended for most patients. Five-day drainage should be reserved for patients with low rectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10026745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  28 in total

1.  Prediction of urinary retention after surgery for rectal cancer using voiding efficiency in the 24 h following Foley catheter removal.

Authors:  Ken Imaizumi; Yuichiro Tsukada; Yoshinobu Komai; Shogo Nomura; Koji Ikeda; Yuji Nishizawa; Takeshi Sasaki; Akinobu Taketomi; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Overlooked Long-Term Complications of Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Giglia; Sharon L Stein
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

3.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Optimal timing of urinary catheter removal following pelvic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yung Lee; Tyler McKechnie; Jeremy E Springer; Aristithes G Doumouras; Dennis Hong; Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Early removal of urinary drainage in patients receiving epidural analgesia after colorectal surgery within an ERAS protocol is feasible.

Authors:  André Schreiber; Emine Aydil; Uwe Walschus; Anne Glitsch; Maciej Patrzyk; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Tobias Schulze
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  J Nygren; J Thacker; F Carli; K C H Fearon; S Norderval; D N Lobo; O Ljungqvist; M Soop; J Ramirez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Randomized controlled trial of tamsulosin for prevention of acute voiding difficulty after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Je-Ho Jang; Sung-Bum Kang; Sung-Min Lee; Jun-Seok Park; Duck-Woo Kim; Soyeon Ahn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Urinary catheter management.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-09

9.  Scoring Systems Used to Predict Bladder Dysfunction After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Hyung Ook Kim; Young Sam Cho; Hungdai Kim; Sung Ryol Lee; Kyung Uk Jung; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Sung-Min Lee; Sung-Bum Kang; Je-Ho Jang; Jun-Seok Park; Samin Hong; Taek-Gu Lee; Soyeon Ahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.