Literature DB >> 10025741

Reevaluation of the ABCD rule for epiluminescence microscopy.

M Binder1, H Kittler, A Steiner, M Dawid, H Pehamberger, K Wolff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) provides for increased accuracy in the clinical diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions (PSL). It is based on pattern analysis of ELM criteria, which requires experience. The recently introduced application of the ABCD score to ELM facilitates this by permitting lesion evaluation on the basis of predefined clinical criteria.
OBJECTIVE: The present study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the ABCD rule for ELM in pigmented skin lesions testing dermatologists with varying skills from novice to expert.
METHODS: Two hundred fifty electronic images of randomly selected, histologically proven PSL including 41 early melanomas (16.4%) were presented to the raters, and each image was scored according to the rules of the ABCD score and rated without the guidance of a scoring system on a scale from 1 = definitely benign to 5 = definitely melanoma.
RESULTS: Our data show that the application of the ABCD rule significantly enhances diagnostic ability in less experienced dermatologists compared with rating without the guidance of a scoring system. In contrast, the diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists who are moderately to greatly experienced is not improved by use of the ABCD rule.
CONCLUSION: Our experiments indicate that the application of the ABCD rule to ELM introduced by Stolz et al represents a useful enhancement for diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions in less experienced users. However, the method does fail to detect melanomas with 100% accuracy. Therefore further effort has to be made to make the diagnosis of melanoma easier and more accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10025741     DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70184-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  5 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of malignant skin tumours: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Quan Xiong; Shu-Juan Ma; Yun Mo; Shu-Ting Huo; Yu-Qi Wen; Qing Chen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Rubeta N Matin; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Alana Durack; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Louise Johnston; Susan E Bayliss; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Colette O'Sullivan; Hamid Tehrani; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

3.  Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Matthew J Grainge; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

Review 4.  Diagnosing malignant melanoma in ambulatory care: a systematic review of clinical prediction rules.

Authors:  Emma Harrington; Barbara Clyne; Nieneke Wesseling; Harkiran Sandhu; Laura Armstrong; Holly Bennett; Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Comparison of optical coherence tomography and high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice for the assessment of skin morphology and intradermal volumes.

Authors:  Kornelia Schuetzenberger; Martin Pfister; Alina Messner; Vanessa Froehlich; Gerhard Garhoefer; Christine Hohenadl; Leopold Schmetterer; René M Werkmeister
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.