Literature DB >> 10025024

Radiologic and computed tomography image evaluation of bone regrowth after wide surgical decompression for lumbar stenosis.

P Guigui1, E Barre, M Benoist, A Deburge.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study of bone regrowth after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
OBJECTIVES: To assess bone regrowth at the operation site, to compare the bone regrowth rate calculated from plain radiographs with computed tomographic image examinations, to determine the effects of bone regrowth on clinical outcome, and to investigate the factors promoting bone regrowth. SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA: Moderate or marked bone regrowth in a surgical defect has been reported in most patients after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Postoperative bone regrowth is related to recurrence of neurologic symptoms in the middle of and later on in follow-up periods.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with an average follow-up of 8 years, were evaluated retrospectively regarding the degree of bone regrowth at the posterior arch. Early postoperative radiographs and computed tomographic images were compared with those obtained at final follow-up. Bone regrowth at the operation sites was evaluated as a regrowth percentage of the original laminectomy site.
RESULTS: Decompressive surgery caused bone regrowth to occur at the operation site in most of the patients. However, this regrowth was mild because the mean bone regrowth rate evaluated from plain radiographs averaged 11% and from computed tomographic images 7.7%. In only 20% of the patients was the bone regrowth rate more than 20%. Changes were found to be more elevated at the facet joint level than at the pedicle level. Evaluations of regrowth obtained from plain films and computed tomographic image examinations were compared. Radiographs seemed to overestimate the bone regrowth. The association of postoperative spinal instability with the development of new bone was statistically significant. No relation between bone regrowth and clinical outcome was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone regrowth in a surgical defect occurs in most patients after posterior decompression. In this study the bone regrowth rate was mild and did not affect the clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10025024     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199902010-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  "One and a half" minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with adjacent segment unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for spondylolisthesis with bisegmental stenosis.

Authors:  Christoph Wipplinger; Carolin Melcher; R Nick Hernandez; Sara Lener; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Sertac Kirnaz; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Eliana Kim; Roger Härtl
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Microscopic Bilateral Decompression via a Unilateral Approach for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Sho Dohzono; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Akira Matsumura; Hidetomi Terai; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

3.  Lumbar Canal Stenosis Caused by Marked Bone Overgrowth after Decompression Surgery.

Authors:  Hiroya Shimauchi-Ohtaki; Manabu Minami; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Ryo Kanematsu; Fumiaki Honda; Junya Hanakita
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Bilateral Decompression via Microscopic TubularCrossing Laminotomy (MTCL) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technique and Early Surgical Result.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Jin-Sung Kim; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Jung-Woo Hur
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  A comparison of the degree of lateral recess and foraminal enlargement with facet preservation in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with standard surgical tools versus a novel powered filing instrument: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Murat Cosar; Larry T Khoo; Christopher A Yeung; Anthony T Yeung
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-11-01

6.  Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Yoichiro Hatta; Hitoshi Tonomura; Masateru Nagae; Ryota Takatori; Yasuo Mikami; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-05-29

7.  Unintentional Fusion in Preserved Facet Joints without Bone Grafting after Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Katsuhisa Yamada; Ken Nagahama; Yuichiro Abe; Eihiro Murota; Shigeto Hiratsuka; Masahiko Takahata; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.