STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical comparison of two commonly used anterior spinal devices: the Smooth Rod Kaneda and the Synthes Anterior Thoracolumbar Spinal Plate. OBJECTIVES: To compare the stability imparted to the human cadaveric spine by the Smooth Rod Kaneda and Synthes Anterior Spinal Plate, and to assess how well these devices withstand fatigue and uni- and bilateral facetectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Biomechanical studies on the aforementioned and similar devices have been performed using synthetic, porcine, calf, or dog spines. As of the time of this writing, studies comparing anterior spinal implants using human cadaveric spines are scarce. METHODS: An L1 corpectomy was performed on 19 spines. Stabilization was accomplished by an interbody wooden graft and the application of the Smooth Rod Kaneda in 10 spines and the Synthes Anterior Spinal Plate in the remaining 9. Biomechanical testing of the spines was performed in six degrees of freedom before and after stabilization, and after fatiguing to 5000 cycles of +/- 3 Nm of flexion and extension. Testing was repeated after uni- and bilateral facetectomy. RESULTS: After stabilization, the Smooth Rod Kaneda was significantly more rigid than the anterior thoracolumbar bar spinal plate in extension. After fatigue, the Smooth Rod Kaneda was significantly stiffer than the anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate in flexion, extension, right lateral bending, left lateral bending, and right axial rotation. A significant decrease in stiffness was noted with the Synthes device in flexion after bilateral facetectomy compared with the stabilized spine. CONCLUSIONS: The smooth Rod Kaneda device tends to be stiffer than the anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate, particularly in extension, exceeding the anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate in fatigue tolerance. The spine stabilized with the anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate is more susceptible to the destabilizing effect of bilateral facetectomy than than that stabilized with the Smooth Rod Kaneda. The additional rigidity encountered with the Smooth Rod Kaneda must be weighed against the simplicity of anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate application.
STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical comparison of two commonly used anterior spinal devices: the Smooth Rod Kaneda and the Synthes Anterior Thoracolumbar Spinal Plate. OBJECTIVES: To compare the stability imparted to the human cadaveric spine by the Smooth Rod Kaneda and Synthes Anterior Spinal Plate, and to assess how well these devices withstand fatigue and uni- and bilateral facetectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Biomechanical studies on the aforementioned and similar devices have been performed using synthetic, porcine, calf, or dog spines. As of the time of this writing, studies comparing anterior spinal implants using human cadaveric spines are scarce. METHODS: An L1 corpectomy was performed on 19 spines. Stabilization was accomplished by an interbody wooden graft and the application of the Smooth Rod Kaneda in 10 spines and the Synthes Anterior Spinal Plate in the remaining 9. Biomechanical testing of the spines was performed in six degrees of freedom before and after stabilization, and after fatiguing to 5000 cycles of +/- 3 Nm of flexion and extension. Testing was repeated after uni- and bilateral facetectomy. RESULTS: After stabilization, the Smooth Rod Kaneda was significantly more rigid than the anterior thoracolumbar bar spinal plate in extension. After fatigue, the Smooth Rod Kaneda was significantly stiffer than the anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate in flexion, extension, right lateral bending, left lateral bending, and right axial rotation. A significant decrease in stiffness was noted with the Synthes device in flexion after bilateral facetectomy compared with the stabilized spine. CONCLUSIONS: The smooth Rod Kaneda device tends to be stiffer than the anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate, particularly in extension, exceeding the anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate in fatigue tolerance. The spine stabilized with the anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate is more susceptible to the destabilizing effect of bilateral facetectomy than than that stabilized with the Smooth Rod Kaneda. The additional rigidity encountered with the Smooth Rod Kaneda must be weighed against the simplicity of anterior thoracolumbar spinal plate application.
Authors: Markus Schultheiss; Michael Sarkar; Markus Arand; Michael Kramer; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lothar Kinzl; Erich Hartwig Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2004-07-10 Impact factor: 3.134