Literature DB >> 10024858

Reliability of transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve morphology: pathological correlation in 178 patients.

K L Chan1, W A Stinson, J P Veinot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient characteristics affecting the utility of transthoracic echocardiography in determining aortic valve morphology, particularly for the diagnosis of congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV).
DESIGN: A retrospective comparison of preoperative echocardiographic determination of aortic valve morphology with pathological findings of the explanted valves.
SETTING: A tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who had aortic valve replacement between July 1994 and April 1996, and had preoperative echocardiograms.
RESULTS: Of 313 patients, 181 (58%) had preoperative echocardiography. Three of the valves were excluded because they were too fragmented for pathological determination of valvular morphology. In the remaining 178 patients, aortic valvular morphology was determined by echocardiography in 104 (58%). Multivariate analysis showed that echocardiography was successful less often in women (odds ratio 0.44, P = 0.03) and in patients with densely calcified valves (odds ratio 0.69, P = 0.02), whereas age had no effect (odd ratio 0.99, P = 0.42). In those with adequate echocardiographic images, echocardiography had both a high sensitivity (0.92) and a high specificity (0.96) for the diagnosis of BAV.
CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography is a useful tool for the diagnosis of BAV, although suboptimal images may pose a problem in many patients, particularly women and patients with heavily calcified valves. When adequate images are obtained, transthoracic echocardiography can reliably identify aortic valvular morphology in most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10024858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  12 in total

1.  Morphological assessment of the aortic valve using coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Seung Choul Lee; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Keun Chee; Hweung Kon Hwang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Prevalence of Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Associated Aortopathy in Newborns in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Sillesen; Ottilia Vøgg; Christian Pihl; Anna Axelsson Raja; Karin Sundberg; Cathrine Vedel; Helle Zingenberg; Finn Stener Jørgensen; Niels Vejlstrup; Kasper Iversen; Henning Bundgaard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Aortic valve morphology definition with transthoracic combined with transesophageal echocardiography in a population with high prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Josep M Alegret; Oscar Palazón; Ignasi Duran; Josep M Vernis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Misclassification of bicuspid aortic valves is common and varies by imaging modality and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Peyton M Cramer; Siddharth K Prakash
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 5.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: Endorsed by The American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Fogel; Shaftkat Anwar; Craig Broberg; Lorna Browne; Taylor Chung; Tiffanie Johnson; Vivek Muthurangu; Michael Taylor; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Carolyn Wilhelm
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 8.589

6.  Diagnostic accuracy study of routine echocardiography for bicuspid aortic valve: a retrospective study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Hillebrand; Dietmar Koschyk; Pia Ter Hark; Helke Schüler; Meike Rybczynski; Jürgen Berger; Amit Gulati; Alexander M Bernhardt; Christian Detter; Evaldas Girdauskas; Stefan Blankenberg; Yskert von Kodolitsch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-08

Review 7.  Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon).

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Siddharth K Prakash; Alessandro Della Corte; Malenka M Bissell; Nandan Anavekar; Patrick Mathieu; Yohan Bossé; Giuseppe Limongelli; Eduardo Bossone; D Woodrow Benson; Patrizio Lancellotti; Eric M Isselbacher; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Thoralf M Sundt; Philippe Pibarot; Artur Evangelista; Dianna M Milewicz; Simon C Body
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in women with cardiovascular disease: position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR).

Authors:  Karen G Ordovas; Lauren A Baldassarre; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; James Carr; Juliano Lara Fernandes; Vanessa M Ferreira; Luba Frank; Sophie Mavrogeni; Ntobeko Ntusi; Ellen Ostenfeld; Purvi Parwani; Alessia Pepe; Subha V Raman; Hajime Sakuma; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Anne Marie Valente; Monvadi B Srichai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Bicuspid stenotic aortic valves: clinical characteristics and morphological assessment using MRI and echocardiography.

Authors:  I C Joziasse; A Vink; M J Cramer; M F M van Oosterhout; L A van Herwerden; R Heijmen; G T J Sieswerda; B J M Mulder; P A Doevendans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ify Mordi; Nikolaos Tzemos
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.866

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.