Literature DB >> 10024706

Why do dyspeptic patients over the age of 50 consult their general practitioner? A qualitative investigation of health beliefs relating to dyspepsia.

B C Delaney1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of late-diagnosed gastric cancer is poor, yet less than half of dyspeptic patients consult their general practitioner (GP). AIM: To construct an explanatory model of the decision to consult with dyspepsia in older patients.
METHOD: A total of 75 patients over the age of 50 years who had consulted with dyspepsia at one of two inner city general practices were invited to an in-depth interview. The interviews were taped, transcribed, and analysed using the computer software NUD.IST, according to the principles of grounded theory.
RESULTS: Altogether, 31 interviews were conducted. The perceived threat of cancer and the need for reassurance were key influences on the decision to consult. Cues such as a change in symptoms were important in prompting a re-evaluation of the likely cause. Personal vulnerability to serious illness was often mentioned in the context of family or friends' experience, but tempered by an individual's life expectations.
CONCLUSION: Most patients who had delayed consultation put their symptoms down to 'old age' or 'spicy food'. However, a significant minority were fatalistic, suspecting the worst but fearing medical interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10024706      PMCID: PMC1313195     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  14 in total

1.  Factors affecting the decision to consult with dyspepsia: comparison of consulters and non-consulters.

Authors:  S Lydeard; R Jones
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-12

2.  Patient delay in cancer.

Authors:  T P Hackett; N H Cassem; J W Raker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The health belief model and participation in programmes for the early detection of breast cancer: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  M Calnan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Concepts of illness causation and responsibility: some preliminary data from a sample of working class mothers.

Authors:  R Pill; N C Stott
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Self-care responses to illness: a selected review.

Authors:  K Dean
Journal:  Soc Sci Med A       Date:  1981-09

Review 6.  Why do people consult the doctor?

Authors:  S M Campbell; M O Roland
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Dyspepsia in England and Scotland.

Authors:  R H Jones; S E Lydeard; F D Hobbs; J E Kenkre; E I Williams; S J Jones; J A Repper; J L Caldow; W M Dunwoodie; J M Bottomley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Pathways to the doctor-from person to patient.

Authors:  I K Zola
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Prevalence of symptoms of dyspepsia in the community.

Authors:  R Jones; S Lydeard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-07

10.  The causes of disease. Women talking.

Authors:  M Blaxter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perceived risk as a barrier to appropriate diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Eunmi Ahn; Ki Young Son; Dong Wook Shin; Min Kyu Han; Hyejin Lee; Ah Reum An; Eun Ho Kim; BeLong Cho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  What makes the dyspeptic patient feel ill? A cross sectional survey of functional health status, Helicobacter pylori infection, and psychological distress in dyspeptic patients in general practice.

Authors:  A O Quartero; M W Post; M E Numans; R A de Melker; N J de Wit
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  A qualitative study of delay among women reporting symptoms of breast cancer.

Authors:  C Burgess; M S Hunter; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs.

Authors:  J Dent; D Armstrong; B Delaney; P Moayyedi; N J Talley; N Vakil
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  The general practitioner-patient consultation pattern as a tool for cancer diagnosis in general practice.

Authors:  Nicholas Summerton; Alan S Rigby; Sara Mann; A M Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Systematic review of factors influencing patient and practitioner delay in diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  S Macdonald; U Macleod; N C Campbell; D Weller; E Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.