BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate computed tomographic (CT) findings for predicting the presence of intestinal necrosis in patients with closed loop and strangulating obstruction of the small bowel. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with surgically confirmed closed loop and strangulating obstruction were divided into two groups with (n = 16) and without (n = 9) intestinal necrosis. By using univariate and multivariate statistical procedures, we evaluated the differences in CT findings between the two groups on the basis of the following six findings: bowel dilatation of strangulated loops (bowel dilatation), wall thickening of strangulated intestines (wall thickening), ascites, vascular dilatation of affected mesenteries (vascular dilatation), elevation of mesenteric attenuation (mesenteric attenuation), and radial distribution of the mesenteric vessels (radial distribution). RESULTS: Of the six findings, ascites, vascular dilatation, mesenteric attenuation, and radial distribution provided significant discriminating findings between the two groups on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, mesenteric attenuation was the most important discriminative factor, followed by radial distribution and ascites. Using these three parameters, the CT was correlated with the surgical findings in 15 of the 16 patients in the necrosis group (sensitivity = 93.8%) and in eight of the nine patients in the nonnecrosis group (specificity = 88.9%). The overall accuracy was 92.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Mesenteric attenuation, radial distribution, and ascites, depicted on CT differentiate well between necrosis and nonnecrosis of the small bowel in patients with closed loop and strangulating obstruction.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate computed tomographic (CT) findings for predicting the presence of intestinal necrosis in patients with closed loop and strangulating obstruction of the small bowel. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with surgically confirmed closed loop and strangulating obstruction were divided into two groups with (n = 16) and without (n = 9) intestinal necrosis. By using univariate and multivariate statistical procedures, we evaluated the differences in CT findings between the two groups on the basis of the following six findings: bowel dilatation of strangulated loops (bowel dilatation), wall thickening of strangulated intestines (wall thickening), ascites, vascular dilatation of affected mesenteries (vascular dilatation), elevation of mesenteric attenuation (mesenteric attenuation), and radial distribution of the mesenteric vessels (radial distribution). RESULTS: Of the six findings, ascites, vascular dilatation, mesenteric attenuation, and radial distribution provided significant discriminating findings between the two groups on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, mesenteric attenuation was the most important discriminative factor, followed by radial distribution and ascites. Using these three parameters, the CT was correlated with the surgical findings in 15 of the 16 patients in the necrosis group (sensitivity = 93.8%) and in eight of the nine patients in the nonnecrosis group (specificity = 88.9%). The overall accuracy was 92.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Mesenteric attenuation, radial distribution, and ascites, depicted on CT differentiate well between necrosis and nonnecrosis of the small bowel in patients with closed loop and strangulating obstruction.
Authors: Martin D Zielinski; Patrick W Eiken; Michael P Bannon; Stephanie F Heller; Christine M Lohse; Marianne Huebner; Michael G Sarr Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Tim Jancelewicz; Lan T Vu; Alexandra E Shawo; Benjamin Yeh; Warren J Gasper; Hobart W Harris Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-08-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Brendan J O'Daly; Paul F Ridgway; Niamh Keenan; Karl J Sweeney; David P Brophy; Arnold D K Hill; Denis Evoy; Niall J O'Higgins; Enda W M McDermott Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.089