Literature DB >> 10024122

Assessing quality of care: administrative indicators and clinical outcomes in posttraumatic stress disorder.

R Rosenheck1, A Fontana, M Stolar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the use of quality of care indicators based on data collected for administrative purposes has become widespread, the relationship between those measures and clinical outcomes has yet to be evaluated. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This study used hierarchical linear modeling to examine the relationship between 12 performance indicators derived from administrative data sets and 6 clinical outcome measures addressing symptoms, substance abuse, and social functions.
SUBJECTS: Patient interviews were conducted with 4,165 veterans 4 months after their discharge from 62 specialized VA inpatient programs for treatment of Posttraumatic Stress disorder.
RESULTS: Five of twelve administrative measures were significantly associated with at least one of the clinical outcome measures, which was all in the expected directions. The number of hospital readmissions during the 6 months after the index discharge was significantly related to poor outcomes on all 5 of 6 measures. Measures of readmission and post-discharge hospital use were more strongly and consistently related to outcome than to measures of access, intensity, or continuity of outpatient care.
CONCLUSION: Administrative data, especially measures of hospital readmission, are significantly related to clinical outcomes. Correlations, however, are small to modest in magnitude indicating that these 2 types of performance measures assess different aspects of quality and can not be substituted for one another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10024122     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  6 in total

1.  Routine evaluation in first episode psychosis services: feasibility and results from the MiData project.

Authors:  Helen Fisher; Kate Theodore; Paddy Power; Brock Chisholm; Jo Fuller; Karl Marlowe; Katherine J Aitchison; Raj Tanna; John Joyce; Maxine Sacks; Thomas Craig; Sonia Johnson
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Using a computerized patient database to evaluate guideline adherence and measure patterns of care for major depression.

Authors:  R S Chen; R Rosenheck
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Acute service delivery in a police-mental health program for children exposed to violence and trauma.

Authors:  Robert A Murphy; Robert A Rosenheck; Steven J Berkowitz; Steven R Marans
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2005

4.  Why health care process performance measures can have different relationships to outcomes for patients and hospitals: understanding the ecological fallacy.

Authors:  John W Finney; Keith Humphreys; Daniel R Kivlahan; Alex H S Harris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Continuity of care and clinical effectiveness: treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Greg A Greenberg; Robert A Rosenheck; Alan Fontana
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.505

6.  Does community care work? A model to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health services.

Authors:  Emiliano Monzani; Arcadio Erlicher; Antonio Lora; Piergiorgio Lovaglio; Giorgio Vittadini
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2008-07-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.