E Hemminki1, P Santalahti, H Toiviainen. 1. National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health, University of Turku, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this survey was to find out whether Finnish physicians had thought about or had observed resource or organizational effects due to the offering of prenatal screening. METHODS: A mailed questionnaire survey sent in 1996-1997 in Finland to all leading Finnish obstetrician-gynecologists, to a random sample of obstetrician-gynecologists providing prenatal care, to general practitioners providing maternity care, and to other general practitioners. The number of respondents was 322 (response rate 70%). RESULTS: Most physicians supported the screening programs currently in wide use in Finland (serum screening for Down's syndrome and ultrasound for malformations), and over a third wanted to introduce the two genetic carrier screenings asked about. Most thought Down's screening took up resources, but they did not consider this to be important. The impact of screening on public or customer images of prenatal care was not an important issue. Instead, a diversity of opinions was expressed on whether the increasing numbers of prenatal screenings require organizational changes in current prenatal care provided within primary care, or whether a shift to hospital clinics is necessary to achieve more specialized care. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians were not concerned by the potential organizational and resource implications of prenatal screening, and apparently they judge screening more from a health and individual patient point of view.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this survey was to find out whether Finnish physicians had thought about or had observed resource or organizational effects due to the offering of prenatal screening. METHODS: A mailed questionnaire survey sent in 1996-1997 in Finland to all leading Finnish obstetrician-gynecologists, to a random sample of obstetrician-gynecologists providing prenatal care, to general practitioners providing maternity care, and to other general practitioners. The number of respondents was 322 (response rate 70%). RESULTS: Most physicians supported the screening programs currently in wide use in Finland (serum screening for Down's syndrome and ultrasound for malformations), and over a third wanted to introduce the two genetic carrier screenings asked about. Most thought Down's screening took up resources, but they did not consider this to be important. The impact of screening on public or customer images of prenatal care was not an important issue. Instead, a diversity of opinions was expressed on whether the increasing numbers of prenatal screenings require organizational changes in current prenatal care provided within primary care, or whether a shift to hospital clinics is necessary to achieve more specialized care. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians were not concerned by the potential organizational and resource implications of prenatal screening, and apparently they judge screening more from a health and individual patient point of view.
Authors: Cate Nagle; Sharon Lewis; Bettina Meiser; Jane Gunn; Jane Halliday; Robin Bell Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 2.655