J Räsänen1, M A León. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Rasanen.Jukka@mayo.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test if analysis of pressure and flow waveform patterns with an artificial intelligence neural network could distinguish between normal and injured lungs. METHODS: Acute lung injury was induced in ten healthy anesthetized, mechanically ventilated dogs with repeated injections of oleic acid, until arterial blood oxyhemoglobin saturation reached 85% breathing room air. Airway pressure, esophageal pressure, airway flow, and arterial and mixed venous saturation signals were stored at 2 min intervals. Hemodynamic and blood gas data were collected every 10 min. Back-propagation neural networks were trained with normalized airway pressure and flow waveforms from normal and fully injured lungs. RESULTS: The networks scored lung injury on a continuous scale from +1 (normal) to -1 (injured). Network scores unequivocally distinguished between normal and fully injured lungs and suggested a gradual transition from normal to injury pattern. However, the response of the network was slow compared to compliance, resistance and venous admixture. CONCLUSIONS: Normal and fully injured lungs display distinct flow and pressure waveform patterns which are independent of changes in calculated pulmonary mechanics variables. These patterns can be recognized by a neural network. Further research is needed to determine the full potential of automated pattern recognition for lung monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: To test if analysis of pressure and flow waveform patterns with an artificial intelligence neural network could distinguish between normal and injured lungs. METHODS: Acute lung injury was induced in ten healthy anesthetized, mechanically ventilated dogs with repeated injections of oleic acid, until arterial blood oxyhemoglobin saturation reached 85% breathing room air. Airway pressure, esophageal pressure, airway flow, and arterial and mixed venous saturation signals were stored at 2 min intervals. Hemodynamic and blood gas data were collected every 10 min. Back-propagation neural networks were trained with normalized airway pressure and flow waveforms from normal and fully injured lungs. RESULTS: The networks scored lung injury on a continuous scale from +1 (normal) to -1 (injured). Network scores unequivocally distinguished between normal and fully injured lungs and suggested a gradual transition from normal to injury pattern. However, the response of the network was slow compared to compliance, resistance and venous admixture. CONCLUSIONS: Normal and fully injured lungs display distinct flow and pressure waveform patterns which are independent of changes in calculated pulmonary mechanics variables. These patterns can be recognized by a neural network. Further research is needed to determine the full potential of automated pattern recognition for lung monitoring.