R J Colman1, J C Hudson, H S Barden, J W Kemnitz. 1. Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center, Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53715-1299, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Various approaches have been used to assess fat and fat distribution in nonhuman primates, including measurements of body weight, body dimensions, and estimates derived from these, such as body mass index. Methods such as tritiated water dilution and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have also been used. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare DXA measurements and somatometrics. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Body composition of 15 adult male rhesus macaques was measured by DXA and somatometrics at four time-points over a 4-year period. Additionally, DXA precision and somatometric variability were analyzed by repeated measurements of the same subjects. RESULTS: DXA estimates of body fat were positively correlated with body weight, body mass index, body circumferences, and abdominal skinfold thicknesses. DXA assessments of soft tissue composition were precise, with coefficients of variation below 3.3% for all compartments analyzed. The majority of the observed variability in somatometrics was explained by subject variance, rather than by inter- or intraobserver variability, or by observer experience level. DISCUSSION: We conclude that noninvasive DXA technology provides precise estimates of nonhuman primate body composition that correlate well with the traditional somatometric measures used in primate studies.
OBJECTIVE: Various approaches have been used to assess fat and fat distribution in nonhuman primates, including measurements of body weight, body dimensions, and estimates derived from these, such as body mass index. Methods such as tritiated water dilution and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have also been used. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare DXA measurements and somatometrics. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Body composition of 15 adult male rhesus macaques was measured by DXA and somatometrics at four time-points over a 4-year period. Additionally, DXA precision and somatometric variability were analyzed by repeated measurements of the same subjects. RESULTS: DXA estimates of body fat were positively correlated with body weight, body mass index, body circumferences, and abdominal skinfold thicknesses. DXA assessments of soft tissue composition were precise, with coefficients of variation below 3.3% for all compartments analyzed. The majority of the observed variability in somatometrics was explained by subject variance, rather than by inter- or intraobserver variability, or by observer experience level. DISCUSSION: We conclude that noninvasive DXA technology provides precise estimates of nonhuman primate body composition that correlate well with the traditional somatometric measures used in primate studies.
Authors: Aarthi Raman; Scott T Baum; Ricki J Colman; Joseph W Kemnitz; Richard Weindruch; Dale A Schoeller Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: C M Bruns; S T Baum; R J Colman; D A Dumesic; J R Eisner; M D Jensen; L D Whigham; D H Abbott Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Patricia E Molina; Charles H Lang; Margaret McNurlan; Gregory J Bagby; Steve Nelson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Elisabeth H M Sterck; Dian G M Zijlmans; Han de Vries; Lisette M van den Berg; Carel P van Schaik; Jan A M Langermans Journal: Am J Primatol Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 2.371