Literature DB >> 10023312

Cost-effectiveness analysis of paclitaxel and cisplatin versus cyclophosphamide and cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. A European perspective.

K Berger1, T Fischer, T D Szucs.   

Abstract

Paclitaxel is a new cytotoxic agent that has demonstrated significant activity in advanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the cost structure of advanced ovarian cancer and the cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel-cisplatin (PC) combination therapy compared with a standard cyclophosphamide-cisplatin (CC) regimen at first-line therapy. The analysis was performed separately for six European countries: Germany, Spain, France, Italy, The Netherlands and the U.K. The study was conducted from the national health service payer's perspective. The total cost of treatment per patient (six cycles of chemotherapy) in the six European countries varied between a minimum of US$4,926 in the U.K. and US$12,578 in Germany for the CC regimen and between US$13,038 and US$24,487 for the PC regimen (April 1996). Since the new regimen improved life expectancy by 1.283 years compared with CC, the incremental cost-effectiveness of PC was calculated to be between US$6,403 per 5-year saved in the U.K. and US$11,420 per life-year saved in Italy. Overall, the cost-effectiveness of PC compares favourably with other oncological interventions. The findings of this study suggest that healthcare decision makers should consider paclitaxel, in combination with cisplatin, as a cost-effective first-line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10023312     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00260-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  9 in total

Review 1.  The use of cost per life year gained as a measurement of cost-effectiveness in Spain: a systematic review of recent publications.

Authors:  José Manuel Rodríguez Barrios; Ferran Pérez Alcántara; Carlos Crespo Palomo; Paloma González García; Enrique Antón De Las Heras; Max Brosa Riestra
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

Review 2.  Analysis of economic evaluations of pharmacological cancer treatments in Spain between 1990 and 2010.

Authors:  Angel Sanz-Granda; Alvaro Hidalgo; Juan E del Llano; Joan Rovira
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Cost Effectiveness of Chemotherapeutic Agents and Targeted Biologics in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Insiya B Poonawalla; Rohan C Parikh; Xianglin L Du; Helena M VonVille; David R Lairson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Young; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  From randomised clinical trials to clinical practice : a pragmatic cost-effectiveness analysis of Paclitaxel in first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Samuel Limat; Marie-Christine Woronoff-Lemsi; Céline Menat; Anne Madroszyk-Flandin; Yacine Merrouche
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Bevacizumab in treatment of high-risk ovarian cancer--a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John K Chan; Thomas J Herzog; Lilian Hu; Bradley J Monk; Tuyen Kiet; Kevin Blansit; Daniel S Kapp; Xinhua Yu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-04-10

7.  Cost-effectiveness of primary debulking surgery when compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gareth K Forde; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-08-02

Review 8.  Bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A critical review of phase III studies.

Authors:  Luigi Rossi; Monica Verrico; Eleonora Zaccarelli; Anselmo Papa; Maria Colonna; Martina Strudel; Patrizia Vici; Vincenzo Bianco; Federica Tomao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-14

9.  Cost-minimisation analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride versus topotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer in Spain.

Authors:  B Ojeda; L M de Sande; A Casado; P Merino; M A Casado
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.