Literature DB >> 10023205

Antimicrobial activity of amalgams, alloys and their elements and phases.

J J Morrier1, G Suchett-Kaye, D Nguyen, J P Rocca, J Blanc-Benon, O Barsotti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial effect of amalgams, alloys, elements and phases against two cariogenic bacteria, Actinomyces viscosus and Streptococcus mutans.
METHODS: Test materials comprised: (i) commercial amalgams comprising Amalcap (Vivadent), Cavex Avalloy LC and DP (Cavex), Cupromuc (Merz), Fluoralloy and Synalloy (Dentoria); (ii) Ag-Cu alloy; (iii) gamma, gamma 1, gamma 2 and Cu6Sn5 phases; (iv) pure metal samples and chloride solutions of copper, mercury, tin and zinc; and (v) aqueous sodium fluoride. Bacterial suspensions of each of the two bacteria were grown in the presence of the test materials for 24 h. Antimicrobial effectiveness was assessed by measuring reduction in optical density at 640 nm using a visible spectrophotometer.
RESULTS: Cupromuc/Fluoralloy, non gamma 2 amalgams and Amalcap displayed high, moderate and no antibacterial activity, respectively. Antibacterial effectiveness was not related to copper content. Whereas mercury, copper, Ag-Cu alloy, fluoride and zinc showed antibacterial activity (Hg > Cu > F > Zn), tin, gamma phases and Cu6Sn5 showed no such activity. SIGNIFICANCE: Although the fluoride and copper solutions were most effective at 50 micrograms ml-1 concentration, their antibacterial action was still significant, albeit reduced, at 10 micrograms ml-1 concentration. This was not the case for mercury chloride which was just as effective at both concentrations. Our results show that although mercury and copper contribute significantly to the antibacterial properties of amalgams, a high copper content does not necessarily relate to high antibacterial effectiveness. These elements could be useful in conferring antibacterial properties to amalgam although their effects on host cells must be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10023205     DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(98)00022-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  9 in total

1.  Mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in plaque on a leucite-reinforced dental ceramic and on a calcium aluminate cement.

Authors:  Katarina Konradsson; R Claesson; J W V van Dijken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Restoration materials and secondary caries using an in vitro biofilm model.

Authors:  N K Kuper; F H van de Sande; N J M Opdam; E M Bronkhorst; J J de Soet; M S Cenci; M C D J N M Huysmans
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Staphylococcal Osteomyelitis: Disease Progression, Treatment Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nicola Kavanagh; Emily J Ryan; Amro Widaa; Gillian Sexton; Jerome Fennell; Sadhbh O'Rourke; Kevin C Cahill; Cathal J Kearney; Fergal J O'Brien; Steven W Kerrigan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Evaluation of minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentration of nano-silver base inorganic anti-microbial agent (Novaron(®)) against streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Goda Holla; Ramakrishna Yeluri; Autar Krishen Munshi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

5.  The role of surface copper content on biofilm formation by drinking water bacteria.

Authors:  I B Gomes; L C Simões; M Simões
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 6.  Recognition and management of palatogingival groove for tooth survival: a literature review.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Kim; Yoorina Choi; Mi-Kyung Yu; Kwang-Won Lee; Kyung-San Min
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2017-04-12

7.  A biocompatible sol-gel derived titania coating for medical implants with antibacterial modification by copper integration.

Authors:  Hans Gollwitzer; Maximilian Haenle; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Frank Heidenau; Norbert Harrasser
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 8.  Influence of Dental Prosthesis and Restorative Materials Interface on Oral Biofilms.

Authors:  Yu Hao; Xiaoyu Huang; Xuedong Zhou; Mingyun Li; Biao Ren; Xian Peng; Lei Cheng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  In vitro antibacterial activity of self-etch bio-active dental adhesives after artificial aging.

Authors:  Gulbike Demirel; Mujde Eryilmaz; Hande Seberol; Gurkan Gur
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2019-01-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.