J M Strother1, D H Kohn, J B Dennison, B H Clarkson. 1. Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Glass ionomers may be "recharged" through topical fluoride (F-) treatments; however, this reported "recharging," may be attributed to surface changes after F- treatment. This study examined differences in F- release and re-uptake among dual-cured and chemically-cured glass ionomers, and a photo-cured F- releasing composite. A secondary goal was to determine if tensile strength or surface roughness changed due to F- release, or F- re-uptake and re-release. METHODS: In Phase 1, initial surface roughness and diametral tensile strength were measured. F- release was measured for 30 days. Strength and roughness were then remeasured. In Phase 2, surface roughness was measured, then materials were treated with a 5000 ppm neutral F- gel, the same gel without F-, or phosphoric acid. F- release was measured for 30 days, then final surface roughness and strength were determined. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in amount and rate of F- release, and F- re-uptake and re-release among study materials and enamel controls (p < 0.001). The amount and rate of F- re-release after NaF treatment differed significantly from F- release after acid treatment in glass ionomers, although both groups showed increased F- release after surface treatment (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in tensile strength or surface roughness after F- release or F- re-uptake and re-release as determined by ANOVA. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this in vitro study indicate that applications of neutral 5000 ppm F- gel to aged glass ionomer restorations results in a significant fluoride uptake and subsequent release. The data suggest that the application of neutral fluoride gel to glass ionomer restorations in situ may result in increases in oral fluoride concentrations, without affecting the restoration's surface roughness or tensile strength.
OBJECTIVES: Glass ionomers may be "recharged" through topical fluoride (F-) treatments; however, this reported "recharging," may be attributed to surface changes after F- treatment. This study examined differences in F- release and re-uptake among dual-cured and chemically-cured glass ionomers, and a photo-cured F- releasing composite. A secondary goal was to determine if tensile strength or surface roughness changed due to F- release, or F- re-uptake and re-release. METHODS: In Phase 1, initial surface roughness and diametral tensile strength were measured. F- release was measured for 30 days. Strength and roughness were then remeasured. In Phase 2, surface roughness was measured, then materials were treated with a 5000 ppm neutral F- gel, the same gel without F-, or phosphoric acid. F- release was measured for 30 days, then final surface roughness and strength were determined. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in amount and rate of F- release, and F- re-uptake and re-release among study materials and enamel controls (p < 0.001). The amount and rate of F- re-release after NaF treatment differed significantly from F- release after acid treatment in glass ionomers, although both groups showed increased F- release after surface treatment (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in tensile strength or surface roughness after F- release or F- re-uptake and re-release as determined by ANOVA. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this in vitro study indicate that applications of neutral 5000 ppm F- gel to aged glass ionomer restorations results in a significant fluoride uptake and subsequent release. The data suggest that the application of neutral fluoride gel to glass ionomer restorations in situ may result in increases in oral fluoride concentrations, without affecting the restoration's surface roughness or tensile strength.