B B Choi1, J Steckel, G Denoto, E D Vaughan, P N Schlegel. 1. James Buchanan Brady Foundation, Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The number of radical retropubic prostatectomies performed in the United States has increased during the last decade. There are 5 to 10% of candidates for radical retropubic prostatectomy who have a detectable inguinal hernia on physical examination. Furthermore, recent data suggest that there is an increased incidence of inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. We evaluated the role of simultaneous inguinal hernioplasty during radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 575 radical prostatectomy procedures from June 1991 to June 1997, 70 hernioplasties were performed in 48 patients. Retrospective chart review was performed for all men who underwent simultaneous hernia repair. Mean patient age was 60.9 years (range 43 to 73). Polypropylene or polyester fiber prostheses were used for mesh hernioplasty. All repairs were performed using a preperitoneal approach during radical retropubic prostatectomy. RESULTS: There were 35 hernioplasties performed without and 35 with mesh. Mean postoperative followup was 24 months (range 6 to 66). Of the hernias 71% were indirect and 29% were direct. No recurrence was detected after mesh hernioplasty, whereas 5 hernias (14%) recurred in the nonmesh group. In this group 2 men (4%) also had de novo hernias on the contralateral side during followup. All recurrent hernias were diagnosed within 1 year of the initial operation. No patient had wound infection, persistent neuralgia or ischemic orchitis. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous repair of inguinal hernias during radical retropubic prostatectomy is effective and technically feasible. There is convenient access to the preperitoneal space during radical retropubic prostatectomy and hernia repair adds only 5 to 10 minutes of operative time. Mesh repair appears to offer optimized results compared to the nonmesh technique. Despite the use of prosthetic material, no complications were attributable to its application during these genitourinary procedures.
PURPOSE: The number of radical retropubic prostatectomies performed in the United States has increased during the last decade. There are 5 to 10% of candidates for radical retropubic prostatectomy who have a detectable inguinal hernia on physical examination. Furthermore, recent data suggest that there is an increased incidence of inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. We evaluated the role of simultaneous inguinal hernioplasty during radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 575 radical prostatectomy procedures from June 1991 to June 1997, 70 hernioplasties were performed in 48 patients. Retrospective chart review was performed for all men who underwent simultaneous hernia repair. Mean patient age was 60.9 years (range 43 to 73). Polypropylene or polyester fiber prostheses were used for mesh hernioplasty. All repairs were performed using a preperitoneal approach during radical retropubic prostatectomy. RESULTS: There were 35 hernioplasties performed without and 35 with mesh. Mean postoperative followup was 24 months (range 6 to 66). Of the hernias 71% were indirect and 29% were direct. No recurrence was detected after mesh hernioplasty, whereas 5 hernias (14%) recurred in the nonmesh group. In this group 2 men (4%) also had de novo hernias on the contralateral side during followup. All recurrent hernias were diagnosed within 1 year of the initial operation. No patient had wound infection, persistent neuralgia or ischemic orchitis. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous repair of inguinal hernias during radical retropubic prostatectomy is effective and technically feasible. There is convenient access to the preperitoneal space during radical retropubic prostatectomy and hernia repair adds only 5 to 10 minutes of operative time. Mesh repair appears to offer optimized results compared to the nonmesh technique. Despite the use of prosthetic material, no complications were attributable to its application during these genitourinary procedures.
Authors: A González-Ojeda; R Anaya-Prado; C Fuentes-Orozco; E Portilla-de-Buen; M I Muciño-Hernández; C O Medina-Meza Journal: Hernia Date: 2003-04-24 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: I Filiadis; K Hastazeris; I Tsimaris; A Papadopoulos; S Kakoulidis; N E Stavropoulos Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.370