Literature DB >> 10021366

A quantitative three-dimensional model of the Drosophila optic lobes.

K Rein1, M Zöckler, M Heisenberg.   

Abstract

A big step in the neurobiology of Drosophila would be to establish a standard for brain anatomy to which to relate morphological, developmental and genetic data. We propose that only an average brain and its variance would be a biologically meaningful reference and have developed an averaging procedure. Here, we present a brief outline of this method and apply it to the optic lobes of Drosophila melanogaster wild-type Canton S. Whole adult brains are stained with a fluorescent neuropil marker and scanned with the confocal microscope. The resulting three-dimensional data sets are automatically aligned into a common coordinate system and intensity averages calculated. We use effect-size maps for the fast detection of differences between averages. For morphometric analysis, neuropil structures are labelled and superimposed to give a three-dimensional probabilistic map. In the present study, the method was applied to 66 optic lobes. We found their size, shape and position to be highly conserved between animals. Similarity was even higher between left and right optic lobes of the same animal. Sex differences were more pronounced. Female optic lobes were 6% larger than those of males. This value corresponds well with the higher number of ommatidia in females. As females have their additional ommatidia dorsally and ventrally, the additional neuropil in the medulla, lobula and lobula plate, accordingly, was found preferentially at these locations. For males, additional neuropil was found only at the posterior margin of the lobula. This finding supports the notion of male-specific neural processing in the lobula as described for muscid and calliphorid flies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10021366     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80021-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  7 in total

1.  Application for the Drosophila ventral nerve cord standard in neuronal circuit reconstruction and in-depth analysis of mutant morphology.

Authors:  Jana Boerner; Tanja Angela Godenschwege
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.250

2.  Place memory formation in Drosophila is independent of proper octopamine signaling.

Authors:  Divya Sitaraman; Melissa Zars; Troy Zars
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Programmed cell death in type II neuroblast lineages is required for central complex development in the Drosophila brain.

Authors:  Yanrui Jiang; Heinrich Reichert
Journal:  Neural Dev       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.842

4.  The Virtual Insect Brain protocol: creating and comparing standardized neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Arnim Jenett; Johannes E Schindelin; Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Between extreme simplification and ideal optimization: antennal sensilla morphology of miniaturized Megaphragma wasps (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).

Authors:  Anna V Diakova; Anastasia A Makarova; Alexey A Polilov
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  The Ntan1 gene is expressed in perineural glia and neurons of adult Drosophila.

Authors:  Ana Castañeda-Sampedro; Laura Calvin-Cejudo; Fernando Martin; Carolina Gomez-Diaz; Esther Alcorta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Identification and Characterization of Breakpoints and Mutations on Drosophila melanogaster Balancer Chromosomes.

Authors:  Danny E Miller; Lily Kahsai; Kasun Buddika; Michael J Dixon; Bernard Y Kim; Brian R Calvi; Nicholas S Sokol; R Scott Hawley; Kevin R Cook
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.